At Phys Org
Stone age man had 'feminine side'
July 31, 2012
Dr. Karina Croucher, who has studied buried remains of people living between 7,500 and 10,000 years ago across the Middle East, says the stereotypical view of how Neolithic men and women lived is wrong.
Unlike today, she argues, it was normal for men and women to show compassion for each other- and gender was not so clearly defined. The researcher argues male bias in archaeology has distorted our understanding of how ancient peoples lived, in a new book published by Oxford University Press.
Of the 40 people buried in a “death pit” in South Eastern Turkey where she was part of an excavation team, there were equal numbers of men and women. Her theory is also based, in part, by the find of a teenage girl’s skull buried carefully by the pit, called Kim by the team. The girl – between 15 and 17 years old - whose face has been reconstructed by Chris Rynn and Caroline Wilkinson, now at Dundee University with Stuart Campbell from The University of Manchester, was deeply cared for by the men and women who tended the site.
The facial reconstruction creates an emotive picture of the girl who lived 7,500 years ago. Kim was carefully placed next to the death pit. The pit contained the fragmented remains of around 40 people, along with animal remains, pottery, flint, obsidian, and other material culture. It also displays signs of cannibalism.
Though the finds to modern eyes are gruesome, Dr. Croucher says, they show a compassionate side to both Neolithic men and women. She said: “In the Death Pit, a specific choice was made to inter these human remains - including Kim - within its context, and that undoubtedly required care and effort, not only in its construction, but additionally in keeping the area protected and clear of scavengers.
Even the cannibalism was probably seen by these people as a compassionate act. "When human remains from across the region are examined, it becomes apparent that it was difficult for the living to let go of their loved ones. For example, human faces were recreated onto the skulls of the dead using plaster, and they were cared for within houses. This treatment was not dependent on age or gender, but according to relationships and emotive ties.
“This and other evidence shows that it’s clear the relationship between men and women during the Neolithic Period does not conform to the modern age.
“The stereotypical and inaccurate view of male hunters dominating their more submissive female counterparts is an articulation of male bias in archaeology. It was much less well defined than that: Men and women were treated equally in death and were shown equal compassion, and their tasks were likely to be thought of as equal during life. Our biases in the present were not relevant to our ancestors, and are not natural or inherent behaviours.
“So we should not understand the past in our own terms: it’s more about their relationships with each other; materials and animals."
Dr. Croucher's book was made possible by a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship. Provided by University of Manchester
Indeed, one need only think of the human interments beneath the floors of houses excavated in Catal Hoyuk (also in Turkey). The misleading and silly title of this article aside, it makes an important point.
Gender bias in research has long been a problem. We do tend to filter archaeological findings and historical records through our own modern "filters" -- with all the resultant flaws those filters incorporate. The classic study that I like to point is from the 1970s dealing with the mating habits of mustangs in the southwest United States. I've written about it several times. You can read the article in this May 5, 2007 blog post.