Archaeological mysteries intrigue me. One of the biggest mysteries in chess archaeology, for instance, is how the Venafro chess pieces discovered in 1932 (made out of bone and carved in the Islamic style), dated to the 9th century CE, ended up in a Roman era grave?
And how did the body of an Inca end up in a grave in Norway dated to about 1000 CE? Here is the article:
The Norway Post
June 26, 2007
Archaeological sensation in Oestfold
Norwegian arhaeologists are puzzled by a find which indicates an Inca Indian died and was buried in the Oestfold city of Sarpsborg 1000 years ago.
The remains of two elderly men and a baby were discovered during work in a garden, and one of the skulls indicates that the man was an Inca Indian.
- There is a genetic flaw in the neck, which is believed to be limited to the Incas in Peru, says arahaeologist Mona Beate Buckholm.
The Norway Post suggests that maybe the Vikings travelled even more widely than hitherto believed? Why could not the Viking settlers in New Foundland have strayed further down the coast on one of their fishing trips?
Meanwhile, more digging will be made in Sarpsborg, in an attempt to try to find an answer to the puzzle, NRK reports.
******************************************************************************************
Here is another article on the subject with a bit more information:
Viking Age Inca Indian Found in Norwegian Burial Ground?
Monday, 25 June 2007 Written by Alexander G. Rubio
It has long been known that Viking explorers, traders, and settlers made their way across the North Atlantic, first to the North Sea Islands, then to Iceland and Greenland, and even to the Newfoundland area of North America. But the accepted narrative is that the forays into the American continent proper were brief, and their contact with the native peoples there was nasty, brutish, and short.
But a 1000 year old skeleton found in a burial ground in Norway shows traits usually only found in Inca Indians.
...
[T]he Norwegians, seafarers by nature, due to their long coastline and lack of farmland, struck out across the North Sea, to the North of England, Scotland, Ireland, and to the islands in the north Atlantic, and eventually North America. We know that they encountered natives on their voyages there. But how they could have come across a South American Indian, or how he made his way to the north east coastal regions of Canada, would seem to defy imagination.
Archaeologists working on the conservation of the ruins of the old St. Nicolas church at Borgarsyssel in the Norwegian city of Sarpsborg came across some skeletal remains by accident, as they were removing some rose bushes. "As we pulled out the rose bushes, bones just poured out," archaeologist at Borgarsyssel Museum, Mona Beate Buckholm told Norwegian Public Broadcasting NRK.
It turned out to be the remains of two older men and an infant. And it was the skull of one of the men that puzzled the forensic archaeologists. "A particular bone at the back of the head was not fused. This is an inherited trait found almost exclusively among the Incas of Peru," Buckholm added.
To this day, no other example of this trait has been found in Norway. "While it is tempting to speculate, seeing as St. Nicolas is the patron saint of sailors, it's hard to imagine a Peruvian making his way here at the time. This is quite puzzling."
As one would almost expect with such a maritime culture, there have been finds in the past of people from far off lands ending up in ancient Scandinavia. One such example was the recent DNA evidence that one of the women buried in the royal tomb at Oseberg, one of the most famous Viking Age finds of all time, turned out to be of Black Sea origin. But this would be on another scale entirely. If, and this is still a massive if at this time, further tests and excavations could turn up corroborating evidence for an American link, and the find turns out to not be another Piltdown Man, or simply a very anomalous individual, it would be a sensational discovery, turning established views on pre-Columbian contacts between Europe and the Americas on their head. Right now though, that is speculation more fit for Hollywood movies than science journals.
And how did the body of an Inca end up in a grave in Norway dated to about 1000 CE? Here is the article:
The Norway Post
June 26, 2007
Archaeological sensation in Oestfold
Norwegian arhaeologists are puzzled by a find which indicates an Inca Indian died and was buried in the Oestfold city of Sarpsborg 1000 years ago.
The remains of two elderly men and a baby were discovered during work in a garden, and one of the skulls indicates that the man was an Inca Indian.
- There is a genetic flaw in the neck, which is believed to be limited to the Incas in Peru, says arahaeologist Mona Beate Buckholm.
The Norway Post suggests that maybe the Vikings travelled even more widely than hitherto believed? Why could not the Viking settlers in New Foundland have strayed further down the coast on one of their fishing trips?
Meanwhile, more digging will be made in Sarpsborg, in an attempt to try to find an answer to the puzzle, NRK reports.
******************************************************************************************
Here is another article on the subject with a bit more information:
Viking Age Inca Indian Found in Norwegian Burial Ground?
Monday, 25 June 2007 Written by Alexander G. Rubio
It has long been known that Viking explorers, traders, and settlers made their way across the North Atlantic, first to the North Sea Islands, then to Iceland and Greenland, and even to the Newfoundland area of North America. But the accepted narrative is that the forays into the American continent proper were brief, and their contact with the native peoples there was nasty, brutish, and short.
But a 1000 year old skeleton found in a burial ground in Norway shows traits usually only found in Inca Indians.
...
[T]he Norwegians, seafarers by nature, due to their long coastline and lack of farmland, struck out across the North Sea, to the North of England, Scotland, Ireland, and to the islands in the north Atlantic, and eventually North America. We know that they encountered natives on their voyages there. But how they could have come across a South American Indian, or how he made his way to the north east coastal regions of Canada, would seem to defy imagination.
Archaeologists working on the conservation of the ruins of the old St. Nicolas church at Borgarsyssel in the Norwegian city of Sarpsborg came across some skeletal remains by accident, as they were removing some rose bushes. "As we pulled out the rose bushes, bones just poured out," archaeologist at Borgarsyssel Museum, Mona Beate Buckholm told Norwegian Public Broadcasting NRK.
It turned out to be the remains of two older men and an infant. And it was the skull of one of the men that puzzled the forensic archaeologists. "A particular bone at the back of the head was not fused. This is an inherited trait found almost exclusively among the Incas of Peru," Buckholm added.
To this day, no other example of this trait has been found in Norway. "While it is tempting to speculate, seeing as St. Nicolas is the patron saint of sailors, it's hard to imagine a Peruvian making his way here at the time. This is quite puzzling."
As one would almost expect with such a maritime culture, there have been finds in the past of people from far off lands ending up in ancient Scandinavia. One such example was the recent DNA evidence that one of the women buried in the royal tomb at Oseberg, one of the most famous Viking Age finds of all time, turned out to be of Black Sea origin. But this would be on another scale entirely. If, and this is still a massive if at this time, further tests and excavations could turn up corroborating evidence for an American link, and the find turns out to not be another Piltdown Man, or simply a very anomalous individual, it would be a sensational discovery, turning established views on pre-Columbian contacts between Europe and the Americas on their head. Right now though, that is speculation more fit for Hollywood movies than science journals.
Hei
ReplyDeleteEn liten notis for å si at NRK trakk feile slutninger etter å ha intervjuet Mona Beate Buckholm. Hun sa ALDRI at dette var en inkaindianer eller hentydet til at det var det. Det hun FAKTISK sa, var at de hadde funnet et INKABEIN -og for oss som er litt mere innvidde i terminologien, så er det bare en mangel på sammenvekst i nakken. Og at dette forekommer i 5-6% av inkaindianerne som er den største forekomsten av dette fenomenet samlet i et land. Selv om dette er en sjeldenhet på disse kanter,er det en mulighet for at det var et unntak de fant og mannen var bare var en helt vanlig Østfolding!
Så skam på NRK som vrir og tvister på ting for å lage nyheter i disse agurktider!!! Og for at de har brutt Åndsverkloven ved å publisere bilder uten tillatelse! Og "solgt" dem videre til bla. Peru!
Håper dette kan oppklare missforståelsen og samtidig påpeke at det NRK sier ikke alltid er de mest sannferdige kildene å bygge på!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mvh
Miamy
Hello! I am sorry - I cannot read Norwegian. I tried to find a free on-line translator for Norwegian to English but was unsuccessful.
ReplyDeletePerhaps you are trying to tell me that the peculiarity in the bone structure that is common in Inca indians also occurs in a small percentage of the population elsewhere in the world - 5 to 6%? I did read that in a different article that discussed this skeleton (not the two articles cited in my post).
It will be interesting to see if anything further develops from this story. For one thing, I would like to know if any other skeletons with this particular bone "defect" have been excavated in Europe. I think it is reasonable to assume that if a small percentage of the worldwide population had this bone "defect", evidence of it would have appeared in at least a few ancient skeletons long before this specimen was unearthed in Norway. It seems that the experts almost always choose the most conservative interpretation, however, and for them it is easier to believe that the skeleton in question is a 1,000 year old Norwegian skeleton with the bone "defect" than a 1,000 year old Inca skeleton.
Let us hope further news is published on this interesting discovery.
Thank you for reading my blog!
What the norwegian said was that NRK drew wrong conclutions after the interview with Mona Beate Buckholm. She never said it was an inca indian, or even insinuated that it was. What she DID say was that they had found an "inca-bone", which is merely the name of this kind of abnormalty in the neck. 5-6% of the inca indians have this abnormalty. While it is rare in norway, it might just be a norwegian from Oestfold.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Gramstad, for the clarification. I guess I'm of the romantic turn of mind - I'd like to believe that the skeleton found WAS an Inca!
ReplyDeleteAs a peruvian, I'm quite dazzled about all of this subject. A norwegian friend of mine told me that story a couple of days ago and I barely believed it.
ReplyDeleteFrom my perspective I can acknowledge that there have been theories of ancient peruvian cultures traveling to Polinesia or Micronesia, but going up to Norway is a different thing!
In the other hand there are some Moche (another ancient culture, prior the Incas) pottery which depicts bearded men coming from the seas. This has always been a matter of concern about peruvian archaelogists.
Anyway, the phisiologycal trait on the back of the neck seems an arguable issue.
Cool story, indeed.