6. Ronde le 2012/08/08 à 16:00 | |||||||||
Bo. | No. | Rtg | Name | Résultat | Name | Rtg | No. | ||
1 | 10 | 1490 | MA Indy | ZHOU Qiyu | 1836 | 8 | |||
2 | 9 | 1824 | SERBANESCU Natasa | WCM | LIU Jiaxin | 1666 | 7 | ||
3 | 1 | 1925 | AGBABISHVILI Lali | WCM | PENG Jackie | 2009 | 6 | ||
4 | 2 | 1362 | SHI Ling Yun | ROY Myriam | 1982 | 5 |
Updated Wednesday evening, August 8, 2012:
Hola darlings! Home from work and finally off the email and telephone with Mr. Don. Frankly, at this point, I have NO IDEA WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON with the Women's Championship. This is what I found tonight at Chess-Results.com:
6. Ronde le 2012/08/08 à 16:00 | |||||||||
Bo. | No. | Rtg | Name | Résultat | Name | Rtg | No. | ||
1 | 10 | 1490 | MA Indy | ½ - ½ | ZHOU Qiyu | 1836 | 8 | ||
2 | 9 | 1824 | SERBANESCU Natasa | - - - | WCM | LIU Jiaxin | 1666 | 7 | |
3 | 1 | 1925 | AGBABISHVILI Lali | 1 - 0 | WCM | PENG Jackie | 2009 | 6 | |
4 | 2 | 1362 | SHI Ling Yun | 0 - 1 | ROY Myriam | 1982 | 5 | ||
5 | 3 | 2158 | WIM | KHOUDGARIAN Natalia | 1 - 0 | YUN Chang | 1886 | 4 |
I have NO IDEA what "- - -" means under the Result for Serbanescu and Liu. What's more, RESULTS have already been entered for rounds that haven't even been played yet! Take a look:
7. Ronde le 2012/08/09 à 16:00 | |||||||||
Bo. | No. | Rtg | Name | Résultat | Name | Rtg | No. | ||
1 | 4 | 1886 | YUN Chang | MA Indy | 1490 | 10 | |||
2 | 5 | 1982 | ROY Myriam | WIM | KHOUDGARIAN Natalia | 2158 | 3 | ||
3 | 6 | 2009 | WCM | PENG Jackie | SHI Ling Yun | 1362 | 2 | ||
4 | 7 | 1666 | WCM | LIU Jiaxin | ½ - ½ | AGBABISHVILI Lali | 1925 | 1 | |
5 | 8 | 1836 | ZHOU Qiyu | - - - | SERBANESCU Natasa | 1824 | 9 | ||
8. Ronde le 2012/08/10 à 16:00 | |||||||||
Bo. | No. | Rtg | Name | Résultat | Name | Rtg | No. | ||
1 | 10 | 1490 | MA Indy | - - - | SERBANESCU Natasa | 1824 | 9 | ||
2 | 1 | 1925 | AGBABISHVILI Lali | ZHOU Qiyu | 1836 | 8 | |||
3 | 2 | 1362 | SHI Ling Yun | ½ - ½ | WCM | LIU Jiaxin | 1666 | 7 | |
4 | 3 | 2158 | WIM | KHOUDGARIAN Natalia | WCM | PENG Jackie | 2009 | 6 | |
5 | 4 | 1886 | YUN Chang | ROY Myriam | 1982 | 5 | |||
9. Ronde le 2012/08/11 à 13:00 | |||||||||
Bo. | No. | Rtg | Name | Résultat | Name | Rtg | No. | ||
1 | 5 | 1982 | ROY Myriam | MA Indy | 1490 | 10 | |||
2 | 6 | 2009 | WCM | PENG Jackie | YUN Chang | 1886 | 4 | ||
3 | 7 | 1666 | WCM | LIU Jiaxin | 0 - 1 | WIM | KHOUDGARIAN Natalia | 2158 | 3 |
4 | 8 | 1836 | ZHOU Qiyu | SHI Ling Yun | 1362 | 2 | |||
5 | 9 | 1824 | SERBANESCU Natasa | - - - | AGBABISHVILI Lali | 1925 | 1 |
I do not understand what is going on. I have never seen this kind of thing before. Has Liu withdrawn? Has Serbanescu withdrawn? If so, why are scores recorded for Liu but not for Serbanescu?
Wouldn't you think the organizers would communicate what is going on with the sponsor whose name is attached to the Women's Tournament???
WE HAVE HEARD NOTHING.
Guess who is rather - er - upset (to say the least) at this latest turn of events. Yeah, ME. MOI.
Now, take a look at the "current" standings after R6:
Grille américaine après la ronde 9
Rg. | Name | ELO | FED | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Pts. | |
1 | WIM | KHOUDGARIAN Natalia | 2158 | CAN | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7.0 | ||
2 | AGBABISHVILI Lali | 1925 | CAN | 0 | * | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | - | 5.0 | ||
ROY Myriam | 1982 | CAN | ½ | * | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.0 | |||||
4 | YUN Chang | 1886 | CAN | 0 | 0 | * | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.5 | ||||
ZHOU Qiyu | 1836 | CAN | 0 | ½ | ½ | * | 1 | 1 | ½ | - | 3.5 | ||||
6 | SHI Ling Yun | 1362 | CAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | ½ | ½ | + | 2.0 | |||
WCM | PENG Jackie | 2009 | CAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | 1 | 1 | - | 2.0 | ||||
WCM | LIU Jiaxin | 1666 | CAN | 0 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | * | 1 | - | 2.0 | |
9 | MA Indy | 1490 | CAN | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | * | - | 1.0 | |||
10 | SERBANESCU Natasa | 1824 | CAN | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | * | 0.0 |
Have you noticed what is going on? It does indeed appear that Serbanescu has withdrawn. WE HAVE NOT BEEN INFORMED OF THIS. I have no idea what is going on with Liu who, according to the purported results shown above, has draws already recorded for Rounds 7 and 8 and a loss in Round 9. Why was she entitled to have scores entered for her, and how were those scores concocted, when Serbanescu receives nothing but dashes? WE HAVE NOT BEEN INFORMED OF THIS.
Updated August 9, 2012:
Sadly, it has been confirmed that Natasa Serbanescu has withdrawn from the tournament. And also, today, evidently, rising star Jackie Peng has also withdrawn. A forfeit was recorded in her round today. A player ordinarily does not allow that to happen. Another fine player lost.
I was also informed that, with the agreement of the players involved (Rounds 7-9), Liu Jiaxin was allowed to play those three games I was so puzzled about yesterday at different times other than what would normally be scheduled, because she will not be available to complete the entire tournament in it's normal schedule. The results that were recorded at Chess-Results.com for Liu were from those games. If the results of her games, by round, had been reported as if they had been played during the actual round, I would never have known; but as they were reported (see above, my comments from last night and my puzzlement how games could be played when rounds had not yet occurred) all at once before the rounds were played, I had questions! The information I present here this evening is what I was told in response to my inquiries.
Here are the results for R7:
7. Ronde le 2012/08/09 à 16:00 | |||||||||
Bo. | No. | Rtg | Name | Résultat | Name | Rtg | No. | ||
1 | 4 | 1886 | YUN Chang | 1 - 0 | MA Indy | 1490 | 10 | ||
2 | 5 | 1982 | ROY Myriam | ½ - ½ | WIM | KHOUDGARIAN Natalia | 2158 | 3 | |
3 | 6 | 2009 | WCM | PENG Jackie | - - + | SHI Ling Yun | 1362 | 2 | |
4 | 7 | 1666 | WCM | LIU Jiaxin | ½ - ½ | AGBABISHVILI Lali | 1925 | 1 | |
5 | 8 | 1836 | ZHOU Qiyu | - - - | SERBANESCU Natasa | 1824 | 9 |
Here are the standings after R7:
Grille américaine après la ronde 97
Rg. | Name | ELO | FED | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Pts. | |
1 | WIM | KHOUDGARIAN Natalia | 2158 | CAN | * | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.5 |
2 | YUN Chang | 1886 | CAN | 0 | * | 0 | ½ | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.5 | ||
ROY Myriam | 1982 | CAN | ½ | * | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.5 | ||||
4 | AGBABISHVILI Lali | 1925 | CAN | 0 | 1 | ½ | * | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | - | 5.0 | ||
5 | ZHOU Qiyu | 1836 | CAN | 0 | ½ | ½ | * | 1 | 1 | ½ | - | 3.5 | |||
6 | SHI Ling Yun | 1362 | CAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | + | ½ | ½ | + | 3.0 | ||
7 | WCM | PENG Jackie | 2009 | CAN | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | * | 1 | 1 | - | 2.0 |
WCM | LIU Jiaxin | 1666 | CAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | * | 1 | - | 2.0 | |
9 | MA Indy | 1490 | CAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | * | - | 1.0 | ||
10 | SERBANESCU Natasa | 1824 | CAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | * | 0.0 |
I do not mean to imply that the title was "gifted" to Khoudgarian. She is not responsible for the withdrawal of the other players. Khoudgarian played good chess and won 7 games of 9 (not including today's draw or the forfeit point).
The battle now is for second and third place.
Keep in mind that wherever you see a "+" sign, that is a full point awarded by default. Shi Ling Yun is the beneficiary of two such points. Her score otherwise is - 1.0 - with one game left for her to play. Can she muster an actual win by over the board play???
Are you now thoroughly confused? I sure am. The cross-table should NOT be reporting results ahead of the actual round for which the "pre-played games" were meant to be inserted OR the results of withdrawing players before the round has been completed! You're screwing everything up and confusing me, to be sure. And since I'm writing this blog, I'm your most important reader at the moment. Please make a note for future reference. Thank you very much.
No comments:
Post a Comment