I can't begin to tell you how much this pisses me off! Once lost, this heritage is gone forever. We can never, ever EVER get it back.
From Popular Archaeology
Census Declares Thousands of China’s Heritage Sites “Disappeared”
By Heritage on the Wire Tue, Feb 07, 2012
The results are in from China’s most recent national heritage census — the first in more than 20 years — and they’re not good.
According to the State Administration of Cultural Heritage (SACH), around 44,000 of China’s 766,722 registered heritage sites have completely disappeared, while approximately a quarter of those remaining are either “poorly preserved” or “in a state of disrepair.” No sites were specifically mentioned in the census, but the study included ancient ruins, temples and other cultural relics.
According to Liu Xiaohe, deputy director of the survey, economic construction is among the biggest reasons for the destruction. Many of the vanished sites were completely unprotected or ignored by protection units overseeing national and provincial cultural relics, thereby allowing their demolition in favor of construction projects. In addition, some heritage sites were destroyed without explanation.
Meanwhile, a recent Guardian article reported on the increasingly sophisticated looting gangs that have devastated China’s heritage sites, with a national network of as many as 100,000 looters working to serve international dealers and collectors. According to the report, the thieves use dynamite and sometimes bulldozers to break into the ruins, then search and pillage using night vision goggles and oxygen canisters.
One archaeologist whose teams researched more than 900 tombs in Shaanxi province found that almost every one had been raided. (The SACH survey additionally deemed Shaanxi province the hardest-hit region, with more than 3,500 cultural sites having vanished.)
“Before, China had a large number of valuable ancient tombs, and although it was really depressing to see a tomb raided, it was still possible to run into a similar one in the future,” said Wei Zheng, a Peking University archaeologist, in the Guardian article. “Nowadays too many have been destroyed. Once one is raided, it is really difficult to find a similar one.”
Reports like these appear in stark contrast to China’s recently adopted guideline to promote cultural development. Although the guideline focused mainly on boosting China’s soft power and producing new movies, music, books and art, the tragic loss of thousands of cultural relics does not correlate with cultural development.
News Source: Global Heritage Fund
See more about the Global Heritage Fund at www.globalheritagefund.org.
Showing posts with label destruction of ancient sites in China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label destruction of ancient sites in China. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Chinese People Blame Officials for Loss of Historic Sites
Unbelievable! They are making exactly the same stupid mistakes that officials in the United States did in the 1950-60's and earlier by destroying irreplaceable buildings, forest preserves, waterways and burial mounds, etc. in the name of "progress." Guess the Red Chinese bureaucrats and officials don't read their history, either. Or perhaps they think they're so frigging superior to us wide-eyes they don't give a flying fig - all the fuss about preserving the past is just a lot of crap.
This is one more reason NOT to visit China. The air is filthy, the water is poison (where you can find any to drink, that is), and I just read in a travel review in today's Journal Sentinel that there are 'squat and dump' wide open "toilets" in Bejing. Toilet paper and sinks NOT provided, you just pull your pants down and deliver your load in front of thousands of people walking by. Yep - in Bejing, the premiere city of the People's Republic. Very sanitary, I'm sure. So much for 'superiority.' Gag me!
From Peoples Daily Online
Most blame officials for loss of relics, survey finds
08:39, May 14, 2010
More than 70 percent of respondents in a recent survey accused government officials of destroying the country's relics for their own political benefit.
The survey polled 2,284 Internet users and was released by the social survey center of the China Youth Daily on Tuesday.
Ninety-three percent of those polled supported preserving old buildings and 72 percent said ancient buildings were demolished because of government officials' push for high local GDP growth.
Of those polled, 50.8 percent were in their 20s and 31.7 percent in their 30s.
The poll came amid recent scandals in which historical sites were pulled down to make way for skyscrapers in the country. In the past 20 years, about one-third of the former residences of celebrities in Beijing alone have been demolished, including those listed as cultural relics, the China Youth Daily reported. Nationwide statistics on the destruction of ancient sites in similar cases are unavailable, but many believe the cases are numerous.
In April, an ancient city wall was reportedly destroyed because the transport bureau of Dali in Yunnan province wanted to broaden the road. Also in April, developers filled a scenic lake in Dali's Erhai Park to build a luxury villa.
Two weeks ago, an old blockhouse was removed to make way for railway construction in Nanjing, capital of Jiangsu province.
"The fate of ancient buildings is in the hands of government officials who prefer GDP growth to values of antiquity," said Wang Jilan, a 51 year-old Beijinger whose siheyuan - a traditional courtyard surrounded by four buildings - was dismantled last month.
Wang said thousands of siheyuan had been buried under tall buildings in the past decade. "I do not feel Beijing is my hometown anymore," she said.
In the survey, 93.4 percent of the respondents said it is necessary to protect ancient buildings, with 56.3 percent saying it was "of great importance".
Similarly, 72.2 percent of those polled said government officials should be responsible for vanishing culture relics and 67.4 percent said the officials are undermining the sustainable development of the city.
Only 20.3 percent of the respondents said dismantling ancient buildings can "elevate people's living standard in the short term".
"Government at all levels, relic protection authorities, urban planning departments and local residents are all responsible for the fate of the relics," said Zhang Zhanlu, an associate professor with Renmin University of China.
About 57 percent of those polled said that local residents should be entitled to decide the preservation of an ancient building.
Twenty percent of those polled said it should be decided by the central government, 14.4 percent said local governments should decide and 5.8 percent said government officials should fill that role.
"Preserving the old architecture is equivalent to preserving a source of the city's spirit and its future development," Zhang said.
Source: China Daily
This is one more reason NOT to visit China. The air is filthy, the water is poison (where you can find any to drink, that is), and I just read in a travel review in today's Journal Sentinel that there are 'squat and dump' wide open "toilets" in Bejing. Toilet paper and sinks NOT provided, you just pull your pants down and deliver your load in front of thousands of people walking by. Yep - in Bejing, the premiere city of the People's Republic. Very sanitary, I'm sure. So much for 'superiority.' Gag me!
From Peoples Daily Online
Most blame officials for loss of relics, survey finds
08:39, May 14, 2010
More than 70 percent of respondents in a recent survey accused government officials of destroying the country's relics for their own political benefit.
The survey polled 2,284 Internet users and was released by the social survey center of the China Youth Daily on Tuesday.
Ninety-three percent of those polled supported preserving old buildings and 72 percent said ancient buildings were demolished because of government officials' push for high local GDP growth.
Of those polled, 50.8 percent were in their 20s and 31.7 percent in their 30s.
The poll came amid recent scandals in which historical sites were pulled down to make way for skyscrapers in the country. In the past 20 years, about one-third of the former residences of celebrities in Beijing alone have been demolished, including those listed as cultural relics, the China Youth Daily reported. Nationwide statistics on the destruction of ancient sites in similar cases are unavailable, but many believe the cases are numerous.
In April, an ancient city wall was reportedly destroyed because the transport bureau of Dali in Yunnan province wanted to broaden the road. Also in April, developers filled a scenic lake in Dali's Erhai Park to build a luxury villa.
Two weeks ago, an old blockhouse was removed to make way for railway construction in Nanjing, capital of Jiangsu province.
"The fate of ancient buildings is in the hands of government officials who prefer GDP growth to values of antiquity," said Wang Jilan, a 51 year-old Beijinger whose siheyuan - a traditional courtyard surrounded by four buildings - was dismantled last month.
Wang said thousands of siheyuan had been buried under tall buildings in the past decade. "I do not feel Beijing is my hometown anymore," she said.
In the survey, 93.4 percent of the respondents said it is necessary to protect ancient buildings, with 56.3 percent saying it was "of great importance".
Similarly, 72.2 percent of those polled said government officials should be responsible for vanishing culture relics and 67.4 percent said the officials are undermining the sustainable development of the city.
Only 20.3 percent of the respondents said dismantling ancient buildings can "elevate people's living standard in the short term".
"Government at all levels, relic protection authorities, urban planning departments and local residents are all responsible for the fate of the relics," said Zhang Zhanlu, an associate professor with Renmin University of China.
About 57 percent of those polled said that local residents should be entitled to decide the preservation of an ancient building.
Twenty percent of those polled said it should be decided by the central government, 14.4 percent said local governments should decide and 5.8 percent said government officials should fill that role.
"Preserving the old architecture is equivalent to preserving a source of the city's spirit and its future development," Zhang said.
Source: China Daily
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
