The hot, humid and unbearable tropical weather (dew points were close to 70 nearly every day) we've been suffering through the entire month of August and the beginning of September in my little piece of southeastern Wisconsin is FINALLY over, hooray! Drier and cooler air coupled with plenty of sun have arrived, and I am feeling re-energized. It also helps that my latest flair-up of sciatica seems to have miraculously nearly disappeared, literally overnight! I'm actually tackling some much needed home improvement projects that I should have started and finished a year ago. Oh well.
Headline: DUH! I mean, really. We all know there are a kabillion jillion gallons of water locked up in Antarctica's ice cover and it is melting (along with the ice cover in the Arctic regions) at an alarming and rapidly expanding rate.
Meanwhile, the U.S. government fiddles instead of preparing for the coming inexorable rise in the oceans - and what will happen to the Great Lakes? Will they be inundated with salt water via the St. Lawrence Seaway and other swamped rivers? Holy Hathor! I'm sure there will be those who say - hey, we'll have figured this all out long before 10,000 years from now. I say: Yeah, right (sarcasm).
Students of herstory know for a fact that many great civilizations have come and gone over the thousands of years of recorded herstory and long before that, with many (most) of them wiped out by climate changes of relatively short (a few hundred years) or long (the last Ice Age) duration. But somehow, we just never seem to learn herstory's lessons. Why is that? I leave that to the philosophers to debate. Here's the article:
All of Antarctica Might Melt, Drowning Major Cities
“Combustion of available fossil fuel resources sufficient to eliminate the Antarctic Ice Sheet.”
Few peer-reviewed study titles sound quite so much like a line spoken by the bad-news-bearing scientist from a dystopian sci-fi movie. But there it is. A real-world—and apparently very possible—dystopia.
For what Ken Caldeira, a climate scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science and an author on the paper, published Friday in the journal Science Advances, believes is the first time, he and his colleagues have shown that there are enough fossil fuels still in the ground to melt “effectively all of Antarctica” and ultimately cause as much as 200 feet of sea level rise.Of course, it wouldn’t be only Antarctica that melts under this scenario. “Our study shows that if we don't leave most of the carbon in the ground, we are going to melt most of the ice on this planet,” Caldeira says. “I think this is one of the most important papers of my career.”






